Shut Up, Mandatory Calorie Information

by Tara Ariano on July 16, 2008

in Food, New York, Shut Up

Man, I saw this story on MSNBC today, and trust me: it is so painfully, painfully true. Once you’ve seen that there is not a snack in the Starbucks bakery case that clocks in at fewer than four hundred calories, you can’t un-see it — not even when you then go to a Starbucks in Tennessee that has the decency not to put such appalling information in front of your face all the time. I used to sometimes get the Rice Krispies square, because I thought it wouldn’t be that bad in terms of fat, but then I forgot that marshmallows are all sugar and sugar is all calories, and boo. But the caloric information won’t actually make you swear off eating the stuff all the time — you just might have them less (which, yes, I realize is the point), and feel way more guilty about it on the fewer occasions when you do.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

floretbroccoli 07.17.08 at 12:52 pm

Did you see the big chocolate chip cookie article in last Wednesday’s NYTimes? And did you later see Marion Nestle’s letter to the editor, making clear that each cookie provided 500 calories to the happy consumer?

kab 07.17.08 at 7:45 pm

Hey, chocolate chip cookies are good for you! They contain: flour (grain), eggs (protein), butter (dairy), and (dark) chocolate, which studies have shown is good for you. Why, they’re practically a health food!

Tara Ariano 07.19.08 at 10:39 am

This is why I’m glad I had McDonald’s for dinner on Tuesday, in blissful ignorance.

Previous post: Oh, HELL Toe!

Next post: Weirdniak